prox1 (Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank)
Structured Review

Prox1, supplied by Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 5 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/prox1/product/Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank
Average 94 stars, based on 5 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "PROX1 loss in adult mouse Schlemm’s canal causes permanent ocular hypertension"
Article Title: PROX1 loss in adult mouse Schlemm’s canal causes permanent ocular hypertension
Journal: bioRxiv
doi: 10.1101/2025.11.13.688015
Figure Legend Snippet: Human and mouse SC endothelial cells share a lymphatic-like hybrid phenotype mediated by PROX1. a- Whole mount immunostaining and cryo cross-sections of mouse ( a ) and human ( b ) Schlemm’s canals revealed robust expression of the lymphatic markers PROX1 and FLT4. (c) PROX1 and CCL21 expression were reduced in primary human SC endothelial cells treated with PROX1 siRNA, while levels of the universally expressed endothelial gene TEK were unchanged when measured by real-time qPCR (siControl n = 6, si PROX1 n = 6). ( d , quantified in e ) Western blot revealed reduced expression of FLT4 protein in siPROX1-treated human SC cells (n = 3 per group). ( f ) Reduced expression of lymphatic genes and increased expression of blood endothelial genes were detected in si PROX1 -treated SC cells by RNA sequencing, accompanied by increased expression of TGFB-signaling genes and reduction in cell proliferation markers (n = 3 per group). ( g , quantified in h ) Confocal microscopy of eye flat mounts revealed reduced PROX1 and FLT4 expression in Prox1 flox/flox ; Cdh5 CreERT2 mice 4 weeks after tamoxifen induction at 8 weeks of age ( Prox1 ΔEC). While Prox1 deletion was generally robust, some mosaicism was observed, and a small number of PROX1-positive nuclei were observed in Prox1 ΔEC SC (white arrowheads, Prox1 ΔEC n = 3, Control n = 4). Dashed lines in g outline Schlemm’s canal. ( i ) No change in IOP ( Prox1 ΔEC n = 9, Control n = 7) or ( j ) Schlemm’s canal width ( Prox1 ΔEC n = 3, Control n = 4) was measured 4 weeks after tamoxifen induction. * p <0.05, ** p <0.01 as determined by 2-tailed unpaired Student’s t test. Error bars in c , e , h and i indicate ±SEM, while each point denotes an independent biological replicate.
Techniques Used: Immunostaining, Expressing, Western Blot, RNA Sequencing, Confocal Microscopy, Control
Figure Legend Snippet: SC-specific Prox1 deletion leads to ocular hypertension . ( a ) Schematic of experimental timeline used for nanocarrier induction of Prox1 deletion. ( b , c ) 4 weeks after nanocarrier induction, IOP elevation was observed in eyes of Prox1 flox/flox ; Cdh5 -CreERT2 mice receiving 4OH tamoxifen (4OHT) nanocarriers in comparison to contralateral eyes receiving empty (blank) nanocarriers. IOP elevation persisted throughout the duration of the experiment. No IOP elevation was seen in Cre-negative mice treated with 4OHT nanocarriers. (Cre+, n = 8, Cre-, n = 8). ( d ) In vivo visible light-OCT imaging 12 weeks after nanocarrier-mediated Prox1 deletion revealed no change in canal size on B-scans, or ( e ) longitudinal reconstructions (pseudo-colored in yellow) of Schlemm’s canal. ( f ) Comparison of luminal area by 16 individual OCT B scans captured around the circumference of Schlemm’s canal showed no difference in canal size between matched 4OHT and blank nanocarrier-treated eyes of Cdh5 -CreERT2-positive mice. ( g ) PROX1 expression and canal morphology were examined in Schlemm’s canal flat mounts collected 6 months after nanocarrier induction by confocal microscopy. Dashed lines in PROX1 panels indicate the outline of PECAM1-positive Schlemm’s canal. ( h ) Compared with contralateral control eyes, PROX1 expression was significantly reduced in eyes treated with 4OHT nanocarriers. ( i ) No change in Schlemm’s canal size was observed in 4OHT nanocarrier-treated eyes (n = 6). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, **** p < 0.0001 as determined by 2-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni posttests ( b , c and f ) or 2-tailed paired Student’s t test ( h & i ). Error bars in b , c , h , and i indicate ±SEM, while each point represents an independent biological replicate. Each point in f represents a single measurement captured along the length of Schlemm’s canal, while each violin represents a single eye.
Techniques Used: Comparison, In Vivo, Imaging, Expressing, Confocal Microscopy, Control
Figure Legend Snippet: ( a ) Representative toluidine blue-stained semithin cross-sections of Schlemm’s canal from Prox1 flox/flox ; Cdh5 -CreERT2 eyes 12 weeks after treatment with blank or 4OHT nanocarriers. Semithin sections were imaged by light microscopy and used to measure ( b ) SC cross sectional area, ( c ) canal height (depth) and ( d ) Feret diameter (longest axis; n = 3 pairs of eyes from Cdh5 -CreERT2-positive nanocarrier-treated animals). Schlemm’s canal lumen indicated by red shading. When compared to same-animal contralateral control eyes, no significant difference in canal size or morphology was observed. ( e ) Representative TEM images from the inferior quadrant of matching eyes treated with 4OHT or blank nanocarriers from a Prox1 flox/flox ; Cdh5 -CreERT2 mouse revealed no differences in SC inner wall or juxtacanalicular meshwork morphology 12 weeks after nanocarrier injection. Giant vacuoles (GV) were observed in the inner wall of both 4OHT-treated and contralateral control eyes. Statistical comparisons in b - d were performed using a Bonferroni-corrected 2-tailed, paired Student’s t test. Error bars in b , c , and d indicate ±SEM, while each point represents an independent biological replicate.
Techniques Used: Staining, Light Microscopy, Control, Injection
